English

حجت

“حجت” (hâdzhat) — argument, proof (in dispute) in Persian. Noun, level B1. An argument and a proof in a dispute: "he brought three arguments". When the arguments ran out, they say: his arguments ended. He brought three arguments for moving, says the example. In a live sentence: “سه حجت برای رفتن آورد” — He brought three arguments for moving. Written with the characters ح, ج, ت. A word from the everyday Persian course, level B1.

Updated September 1, 2026 · Lingofly

In short

“argument, proof (in dispute)” in Persian
Written in Persianحجت
Read in Latin lettershâdzhat
Translationargument, proof (in dispute)
Part of speechnoun
LevelB1

Why it looks that way

An argument and a proof in a dispute: "he brought three arguments". When the arguments ran out, they say: his arguments ended. He brought three arguments for moving, says the example

A word with a story stays in memory longer than one learned as a “spelling — translation” pair: memory holds on to meaning, not to a string.

In a live sentence

A single word almost never appears alone in conversation. A sentence shows where it fits and what stands next to it.

  • سه حجت برای رفتن آورد
    se hâdzhat barâe reftan âvard
    He brought three arguments for moving

How not to forget this word

Reading a word and remembering it are different jobs. A day later, little survives of a single reading — and that is not bad memory, that is how memory works.

Frequently asked

How do you say “argument, proof (in dispute)” in Persian?

«حجت», read “hâdzhat”. In a live sentence: “سه حجت برای رفتن آورد” — He brought three arguments for moving. Noun, level B1; written with the characters ح, ج, ت.

How is “حجت” written in Latin letters?

hâdzhat. This is a practical spelling — you need it to read aloud and be understood, not to meet an academic standard.

Why does this word look the way it does?

An argument and a proof in a dispute: "he brought three arguments". When the arguments ran out, they say: his arguments ended. He brought three arguments for moving, says the example. A word with a story stays in memory longer than a “spelling — translation” pair: memory holds on to meaning, not to a string.

Next

Open the wordOpen the word