English

اختلاف را حل کردن

“اختلاف را حل کردن” (ikhtilâf râ hal kân) — to settle a dispute in Persian. Phrase, level B1. The disagreement plus the untying: a dispute here is not "resolved" but untangled, like a knot. With a talk we settled the dispute, says the example. In a live sentence: “با گفتگو اختلاف را حل کردیم.” — With a talk we settled the dispute. Written with the characters ا, خ, ت, ل, ا, ف, ر, ا, ح, ل, ک, ر…

Updated September 1, 2026 · Lingofly

In short

“to settle a dispute” in Persian
Written in Persianاختلاف را حل کردن
Read in Latin lettersikhtilâf râ hal kân
Translationto settle a dispute
Part of speechphrase
LevelB1

Why it looks that way

The disagreement plus the untying: a dispute here is not "resolved" but untangled, like a knot. With a talk we settled the dispute, says the example

A word with a story stays in memory longer than one learned as a “spelling — translation” pair: memory holds on to meaning, not to a string.

In a live sentence

A single word almost never appears alone in conversation. A sentence shows where it fits and what stands next to it.

  • با گفتگو اختلاف را حل کردیم.
    ba gâftâgu ikhtilâf râ hal kardim.
    With a talk we settled the dispute.

How not to forget this word

Reading a word and remembering it are different jobs. A day later, little survives of a single reading — and that is not bad memory, that is how memory works.

Frequently asked

How do you say “to settle a dispute” in Persian?

«اختلاف را حل کردن», read “ikhtilâf râ hal kân”. In a live sentence: “با گفتگو اختلاف را حل کردیم.” — With a talk we settled the dispute. Phrase, level B1; written with the characters ا, خ, ت, ل, ا, ف, ر, ا, ح, ل, ک, ر…

How is “اختلاف را حل کردن” written in Latin letters?

ikhtilâf râ hal kân. This is a practical spelling — you need it to read aloud and be understood, not to meet an academic standard.

Why does this word look the way it does?

The disagreement plus the untying: a dispute here is not "resolved" but untangled, like a knot. With a talk we settled the dispute, says the example. A word with a story stays in memory longer than a “spelling — translation” pair: memory holds on to meaning, not to a string.

Next

Open the wordOpen the word