Do streaks and rewards help

Pay people to study and they will study less, not more — this has been tested over a hundred times. Praise and a clear look at one's mistakes, on the contrary, help. As for whether day streaks and badges help you learn a language — nobody has tested that yet.

Updated September 1, 2026 · Lingofly

Gamification: what held up and what did not

Three different things need to be separated here. Do game mechanics help memorize the material — yes, noticeably. Do they add the desire to study — less so. Do they change behavior — less still.

Then it gets interesting. When the authors kept only the methodologically rigorous studies, the effect on learning held up; the ones on motivation and behavior did not. That is, the industry's most quoted claim — “gamification boosts motivation” — turned out to be the weakest spot of its evidence base.

What amplified the effect: combining a game narrative with people talking to each other, and competition with cooperation. What turned out weakest: plain points, badges and a leaderboard.

Rewards: measured harm

Over a hundred experiments tested the same thing: what happens to the desire to continue when a reward is given for studying. Here is what came out:

Over one hundred and twenty experiments. Exact figures — in the source under the table
What the reward is forWhat happens to the desire to continue
Just for showing updrops the most
For finishingdrops
For doing it welldrops, but less
Praise and a review of mistakes — without money and prizesgrows

The reason is simple. While you study for yourself, it is your own business. As soon as they start paying for it, it becomes work. And when the payments stop, the reason to study disappears with the money.

  • Если платить человеку за занятия, заниматься он станет меньше, а не больше. А похвала и понятный разбор ошибок — наоборот, помогают.checked many times
    Deci, Koestner & Ryan, 1999, Psychological Bulletin 125(6) · 128 экспериментов. Материальная награда: d = −0,40 за участие, −0,36 за завершение. Похвала и обратная связь: +0,33.

Streaks: what we do not know and what can be guessed

Starting with the honest part: peer-reviewed trials of “streak versus no streak” in language apps do not exist. Figures like “streaks cut churn from 47% to 28%” come from corporate materials and were never independently verified.

But you can look at adjacent data. A streak is a reward for not quitting plus the fear of losing it; such things are exactly what lowers the desire to study. And when language learners were asked what keeps them going, it turned out that “I'd be ashamed to miss a day” and “I'll get something for it” are not linked to the outcome at all. Only “I'm interested” and “I genuinely need this” are.

Plus the habit data. A habit settles in on average in 66 days, ranging from 18 to 254, and one missed day does not noticeably affect its formation. A mechanic where a miss zeroes everything contradicts how habits actually form.

This does not mean streaks are useless. It means their benefit is unproven, and the “it all burned down” design has a measured price — and the price is paid by long-term motivation, not by weekly retention.

What this means for an app

  • Show what accumulated, not what is unbroken: a miss should not zero out progress.
  • Give feedback instead of rewards: “you recalled nine words out of ten” works better than points awarded.
  • Do not build everything on comparison with others: the fear of making mistakes gets in the way of learning a language, and a leaderboard only fans it.
  • At the start ask not “what is your goal” but “when and where will you study”. The answer “after morning coffee, at the kitchen table” works; “study more” does not.

What this is based on

Every number above comes from a study, linked next to it. The mark “checked little” means one study stands behind the conclusion — or that researchers still argue about it.

  • Games and points do help you take the material in. That they also add any desire to study rests on much thinner evidence than people assume.checked many times
    Sailer & Homner, 2020, Educational Psychology Review 32 · g = 0.49 for learning, 0.36 for motivation, 0.25 for behaviour. Among the most rigorous studies the effect on motivation did not hold up.
  • Pay someone to study and they study less, not more. Praise and a clear explanation of their mistakes do the opposite — they help.checked many times
    Deci, Koestner & Ryan, 1999, Psychological Bulletin 125(6) · 128 experiments. Material reward: d = −0.40 for taking part, −0.36 for finishing. Praise and feedback: +0.33.
  • The people who keep going longest are the ones who find it interesting or genuinely need the language. “I'd be ashamed to quit” and “there is something in it for me” do not help at all.checked many times
    Alamer et al., 2025, Educational Psychology Review · Correlation with success: interest and importance r = 0.23; guilt −0.06; external reward −0.01.
  • A habit takes about two months to settle: two weeks for some people, half a year for others. One missed day spoils nothing.checked little
    Lally et al., 2010, European Journal of Social Psychology 40(6) · 66 days on average, ranging from 18 to 254. Missing a single day had no noticeable effect on habit formation.
  • Deciding exactly when and where helps more than deciding to study at all. “After my morning coffee, in the kitchen, ten minutes” works; “I really should get to it” does not.checked many times
    Gollwitzer & Sheeran, 2006, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38 · 94 trials, more than 8,000 participants, d = 0.65.

Frequently asked

So streaks are harmful?

There is no direct evidence of streaks being harmful either. What is known: rewards for completion measurably undermine the desire to continue, and “I'd be ashamed to miss a day” is not linked to the outcome. A streak is built as the first and leans on the second.

What about points and levels?

On learning the material, gamification has a positive effect, and that held up in the rigorous studies. The complaint is not about points but about the claim that they raise motivation: that one did not hold up.

What keeps people studying, then?

Interest and genuinely needing the language. Simply put: a language you hear around you every day will hold you better than any badges.

Next

Try one lessonOpen Lingofly